tutor2u
Exam Results Explorer

Ten common mistakes when analysing exam results

From tiny cohorts to national benchmarks, these are the traps that can turn useful exam data into misleading conclusions.

Share this pageWhatsAppRedditFacebookLinkedInEmail

Exam-results data can produce useful questions very quickly.

It can also produce misleading conclusions very quickly.

Here are ten traps worth checking before finalising a departmental results report.

1. Looking at only one threshold

Grade 4+ or A*–B may be important, but neither describes the complete distribution.

Better: examine several thresholds and individual grades.

2. Ignoring cohort size

A ten-percentage-point movement may represent one student.

Better: report numbers and percentages together.

3. Treating national results as a performance target

National results describe a national cohort with a different mix of students.

Better: use national data as a benchmark and source of questions.

4. Saying “percent” when you mean “percentage points”

A movement from 20% to 25% is five percentage points, but a 25% relative increase.

Better: use percentage points when comparing attainment rates.

5. Assuming a year-on-year change is a trend

Two cohorts are not enough to establish a reliable pattern.

Better: look across several examination years where possible.

6. Comparing unlike populations

GCSE all-age results, for example, may include resit candidates as well as Year 11 students.

Better: check exactly who is represented in the national figures.

7. Jumping from correlation to explanation

“Weaker Paper 2 results” does not prove that Paper 2 was taught badly.

Better: treat the result as a question and gather more evidence.

8. Ignoring the shape of the distribution

A stable grade 4+ rate could disguise large changes at grades 7–9 or grades 1–3.

Better: inspect the full distribution.

9. Looking only for weaknesses

Results analysis should identify successful practice too.

Better: ask what should be maintained as well as what should change.

10. Creating too many actions

A long action plan can give the illusion of rigour while making improvement less likely.

Better: identify a small number of priorities with clear evidence behind them.

A useful final test

Before sharing your analysis, ask:

What do the data definitely show?

What are we inferring?

What additional evidence would test that inference?

What action is genuinely justified?

If those four questions are clear, the analysis is probably doing its job.

Explore your results

Use the tutor2u Exam Results Explorer to benchmark your own GCSE or A-Level grade distribution against national data.

Related guides

More from tutor2u

About this guide. Produced independently by tutor2u using tutor2u’s own guidance for teachers and subject leaders on results analysis, alongside published exam-board and JCQ information, to explain the system clearly and put it in context. Reviewed by Jim Riley, tutor2u. How we check this guidance. Last reviewed 30 August 2026.

Last checked August 2026. This is a plain-English summary of official guidance; always check the linked Ofqual, JCQ and exam-board pages for the definitive rules, which can change.

✦ Free from tutor2u

More support from tutor2u - free

Join thousands of teachers and students who use tutor2u for free teaching resources, revision support, exam insights and practical ideas throughout the year. Enter your email to hear what’s new and useful.