tutor2u · Education Hub
Teacher Workforce

What happens to teachers after they qualify?

Nine in ten newly qualified teachers are still in state-funded schools a year later. Ten years on, it is closer to six in ten – and the medium term is where the decline has quietly worsened.

Retention16 August 2026·5 min read
Key finding
Of teachers who gained QTS in 2024, 89.7% were still teaching in state-funded schools after one year. Of the 2015 cohort, 57.7% were still there after ten – and five-year retention has drifted down across successive cohorts even as first-year retention held up.
Retention falls steeply, then keeps fallingPercentage of a qualifying cohort still teaching, EnglandSource: DfE, School Workforce in England 2025. Each checkpoint is a different qualifying cohort.tutor2u51.966.481.095.51 year3 years5 years10 years89.7%75.8%67.4%57.7%
Chart: tutor2u analysis of DfE dataDownload chart for social (PNG) ↓ SVG ↓

What the data shows

DfE follows each qualifying cohort – everyone who gained QTS in a given year – and reports how many are still in state-funded schools in England each year afterwards.

The shape is steep early and shallow later: about 89.7% after one year, 75.8% after three, 67.4% after five, and 57.7% after ten. Roughly four in ten of the ten-year cohort are no longer in a state-funded school in England.

Before that, there is the training-to-classroom step. On the latest published ITT Performance Profiles, 93% of secondary postgraduate trainees achieved QTS, and 77% of those achieving QTS were recorded teaching in a state-funded school within 16 months. That employment measure is provisional.

Four checkpoints, four different cohorts

The single most common misreading of retention statistics is to treat those four percentages as one group followed through time. They are not.

The one-year figure describes the 2024 cohort. The ten-year figure describes people who qualified in 2015 – a different set of people, entering a different labour market, under a different induction regime. Later cohorts simply have fewer years of data, which is why the series are different lengths.

Equally, ‘not retained’ does not mean ‘left teaching’. It means no longer in a state-funded school in England. Some of those teachers moved to independent schools, to further education colleges, or overseas; some returned later. The measure cannot distinguish them.

Where the picture has actually deteriorated

Comparing like with like – the same checkpoint across successive cohorts – is more revealing than the headline curve.

Five-year retention has drifted down: 70.1% for the 2011 cohort, falling to 67.4% for the 2020 cohort, the lowest in the published series.

First-year retention, by contrast, has held up well and recent cohorts look comparatively strong. The pressure is therefore concentrated in the medium term – years three to five – rather than in the immediate post-qualification period that induction support is designed to address.

Why this matters

Training a teacher is expensive, and bursaries in shortage subjects now reach £29,000 before a trainee has taught a lesson. The return on that investment depends on years in the classroom, not on arrival.

For school leaders, the medium-term dip lands precisely when a teacher becomes most valuable – experienced enough to take on responsibility, not yet established in leadership.

And for anyone comparing across sectors, note that these figures are not comparable with college retention. The further education measure is built differently, from different records, with a different definition of entering and leaving the sector.

Explore the data

Follow a single qualifying cohort →See entrants and leavers →
Share: LinkedIn

Sources

Last checked: 16 August 2026. Figures are drawn from the same data layer as the Teacher Workforce Explorer, so charts and text cannot drift apart.

Supporting schools and teachers

Separate from the analysis above: how tutor2u helps schools cover gaps, develop staff and support students.